Even after completely uninstalling browser extensions, accounts can still be flagged, page permissions restricted, or verification triggered directly.
In reality, platforms no longer simply check for "whether extensions are installed." They combine extension detection with fingerprinting and reconstruct your real usage environment from multiple dimensions.
Next, we’ll explain how browser extensions are detected, why they can still be detected after uninstallation, and how to minimize the risk in practical use.

In short, browser extension detection doesn’t just check "whether you currently have extensions installed"; it monitors the entire lifecycle: installation, usage, and uninstallation.
Many platforms identify anomalies through the following methods:
• Whether certain extension characteristics were ever loaded
• Whether fingerprints change significantly before and after uninstallation
• Whether extension-related APIs leave any traces
In other words, even if you have uninstalled an extension, some websites can still infer you “used it” through historical behavior and environmental changes.
This is why many people still get detected even after uninstalling extensions.
Websites record your browser fingerprint when you visit, including Canvas, WebGL, AudioContext, extension-related interface states, and JS execution environment differences.
If these fingerprints change noticeably after uninstalling an extension, it can be flagged as abnormal. ToDetect fingerprint detection analyzes such pre- and post-uninstallation consistency.
Many extensions leave traces even after being uninstalled, such as:
• localStorage / IndexedDB data
• Service Worker registration records
• window object modifications
Professional browser extension detection systems specifically scan these residual points.
Some platforms don’t focus on whether you have extensions but instead monitor whether your behavior resembles a normal user.
For example, after uninstalling an extension, operation paths may suddenly become unnatural, page loading and event sequences abnormal.
Noticeable changes in network request patterns can also serve as auxiliary detection criteria.
• Only uninstalling extensions without handling fingerprints
• Repeatedly installing and uninstalling extensions across different environments
• Logging into important accounts immediately after uninstalling extensions
• Ignoring cache and storage data cleanup
In short, platforms aren’t detecting the “extensions themselves,” but rather the stability of your environment.
If the browser environment is already used for important accounts, frequent installation/uninstallation is not recommended. Stability is more important than anything.
Many people overlook tools like ToDetect fingerprint detection, which help assess whether fingerprints change before and after uninstallation.
If fingerprints change too much, the extension can still be detected even if it has been removed.
Uninstalling an extension ≠ clearing all data. At minimum, pay attention to local storage, IndexedDB, Service Workers, and browser cache.
Otherwise, the detection system can easily trace the residuals.
Logging in, changing information, or placing ads immediately after uninstalling an extension will stand out to risk-control systems.
It’s best to allow a normal browsing transition period.
Browser extension uninstallation detection is no longer simply about whether an extension is installed. It has evolved into a comprehensive assessment of environment consistency + behavioral rationality + fingerprint stability.
If you still believe “uninstalling ensures safety,” you will eventually run into problems.
The safest approach is to start with the overall browser environment, understand the detection logic, and use tools like ToDetect to identify issues in advance rather than relying on after-the-fact remedies.
AD