DNS leak tests often turn red at first, even when the configuration seems fine. Especially when performing a DNS leak test, how do you know if it’s a real DNS leak or a false positive from the testing tool?
In fact, DNS leak detection is not an “absolute standard,” and many results need to be interpreted in the context of the actual environment.
Next, we’ll go through the common causes of false positives and, combined with browser fingerprint detection concepts, step by step teach you how to understand DNS leak test results and avoid unnecessary detours.

Simply put, a DNS leak test checks whether your domain name requests are “bypassing the proxy” and being sent directly to your local network provider when visiting websites.
Under normal circumstances:
• DNS request → should go through the proxy node
• Test result → shows the country or region of the proxy IP.
If the result shows your local ISP’s DNS, it is considered a DNS leak.
Many browsers today (especially Chrome-based ones) have DoH (DNS over HTTPS) and intelligent DNS prefetching enabled by default.
This can cause some DNS requests to bypass the system proxy, resulting in them being flagged as “abnormal” in DNS leak tests.
The solution is simple: disable the browser’s secure DNS, or use an independent network stack within a fingerprint browser.
Many users use fingerprint browsers but overlook one detail: DNS is not necessarily isolated along with the IP.
If the fingerprint browser only isolates the IP but uses the local DNS, false positives in DNS leak detection can easily occur.
Key checks should include:
• Is “independent DNS” enabled?
• Is the DNS bound to the proxy?
• Is the browser environment truly independent?
You can also use browser fingerprint detection to cross-check, not just focus on DNS alone.
Many DNS leak testing sites use globally distributed nodes.
• IP shows: proxy country
• DNS shows: nearby CDN or third-party resolution nodes
This does not necessarily indicate a real DNS leak; it may just be due to the geographic distribution of DNS services.
If you have previously used other proxies or VPNs and did not clear your local DNS cache, the results can be affected.
Try: flush the DNS cache → restart the network → switch the proxy and retest
Sometimes a “false positive” is just an old cache causing issues.
Don’t rely on just one site; it is recommended to use 2–3 different DNS leak testing tools.
Compare the DNS IPs. If the results vary greatly, it is likely a testing error.
Looking at DNS alone is limited; what matters more is the consistency of the overall environment.
You can use the todetect fingerprint tool to check: IP address, DNS resolution, WebRTC, and browser fingerprint consistency.
If IP, timezone, language, and DNS roughly match, the environment can be considered secure.
Check if the target site triggers frequent verification, login alerts from different locations, account risk control, or bans.
If long-term usage is stable without abnormal risk controls, it is most likely a false positive rather than a real DNS leak.
Many people focus only on IP, but neglect DNS. In fact, whether DNS follows the proxy is more important than the IP itself.
Recommended choices:
• Services explicitly labeled “Supports Proxy DNS”
• Proxies that support remote or custom DNS
• Solutions that do not rely on local system DNS
If the proxy takes over DNS as well, the probability of false positives in subsequent DNS leak tests will be much lower.
A common misconception when using fingerprint browsers is that if the IP is independent, DNS must also be independent, but that is not always the case.
In fingerprint browser settings, check whether an independent network environment is enabled, DNS is bound to the proxy IP, and local DNS calls are disabled.
Also, use browser fingerprint detection tools to ensure DNS, IP, and timezone are consistent, avoiding “partial isolation.”
Most modern browsers enable DNS over HTTPS by default. While good for normal browsing, it can trigger false positives in proxy environments.
Recommendation: disable “secure DNS” in the browser or manually specify DNS consistent with the proxy region to prevent bypassing.
This significantly impacts DNS leak test results.
Many make the mistake of assuming that one abnormal test = leak.
The correct approach: use multiple DNS leak testing sites, compare DNS servers for stability, and see if they consistently show the local ISP.
If DNS differs each time, it is more likely due to test nodes or CDN distribution rather than a real leak.
DNS is only part of the network fingerprint, so looking at it alone has limited value.
Recommended: use ToDetect to comprehensively check IP, DNS, WebRTC, language, and timezone.
If the overall fingerprint is consistent and reasonable, even if DNS shows a public resolver, it may not be a real risk.
If you frequently switch proxies or network environments, local cache can easily interfere with judgment.
Regularly flush DNS cache, restart the browser after switching proxies, and restart the network if necessary.
Sometimes a DNS leak is just leftover historical cache causing a false alarm.
Ultimately, DNS leak detection is only a reference tool, not a final judgment. Using browser fingerprint detection combined with ToDetect provides a much more reliable assessment.
If you want to learn more about completely fixing DNS leaks or configuring fingerprint browsers more securely, you can dive deeper, as these are the key factors affecting security.