In the past two years, the term “DNS leak” has been mentioned more and more frequently. Many proxy tools emphasize “DNS leak protection enabled” and “global encryption for better security” in their promotions, which sounds reassuring.
In 2026, we tested several mainstream proxy tools, and the results were somewhat surprising: many tools’ DNS protection is not as secure as you might think.
Today, we’ll explain why DNS protection in many proxy tools is merely a “configuration option” rather than something that is “actually effective.”

A DNS leak means: although you are using a proxy tool, your domain resolution requests are not routed through the proxy but are instead sent directly to your local ISP’s DNS server.
This causes two problems:
• Your ISP can clearly see which websites you visit
• Your real IP and behavior can be easily correlated
Many people only focus on whether their IP is hidden, but overlook DNS. In practice, DNS leaks are often more common than IP exposure.
This test covered several common types of tools and verified results using multiple DNS leak testing websites (including tools like ToDetect fingerprint checker).
The testing method was simple:
1. Open the proxy tool with default configuration
2. Visit DNS leak testing websites
3. Compare the returned DNS server locations
The results were quite “painful”:
• Some tools still showed DNS leaks under default proxy mode
• Even after enabling “DNS leak protection,” some still had abnormal requests
• Browser traffic was fine, but system-level apps (updates, plugins) still used local DNS
In other words, what you think is “global proxy” is actually just “partial proxy.”
| Proxy Tool | Default DNS Strategy | Prone to DNS Leak | Common Issues | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clash (some clients) | Local DNS priority | Yes | Likely to leak without fake-ip or DoH enabled | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| V2Ray (native config) | Depends on manual setup | Yes | Complex configuration, easy to miss DNS forwarding | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Shadowrocket | Hybrid mode | Medium | Some DNS requests bypass due to routing rules | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Surge | Customizable | Medium | Leaks occur if default config is not strict | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Some domestic VPN tools | Not transparent | High | DNS strategy not disclosed, forced local resolution | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Many people test DNS leaks incorrectly, leading to misjudgments. Common mistakes include:
• Testing only once before concluding
• Using only one testing website
• Not distinguishing between browser and system traffic
Recommended correct approach:
• Use at least 2–3 DNS leak testing tools for cross-verification
• Test different browsers (Chrome / Firefox)
• Test different modes (global / rule-based / direct)
Tools like ToDetect not only test DNS leaks but also check browser fingerprinting, which is increasingly important today.
Many DNS leak issues are not due to bad tools, but improper configuration.
• Many tools use local DNS resolution by default, which directly causes leaks.
• Recommendation: Enable Remote DNS and use DoH (DNS over HTTPS) or DoT (DNS over TLS).
• Even if the proxy is configured correctly, the system DNS may still be used.
• Recommendation: Manually set public DNS (e.g., Cloudflare, Google) or let the proxy take over DNS.
• In rule mode, some domains may be misclassified as direct connections.
• Recommendation: Update rules regularly and force proxy for sensitive sites.
Some extensions (especially acceleration or translation tools) may bypass the proxy. This is why browser fingerprint testing is also important.
Many websites now identify users not only by IP but also by browser fingerprints.
If you have:
• DNS leaks (real network exposed)
• Unique browser fingerprint (distinct device profile)
Then you are essentially “fully exposed.” Using ToDetect, you may see:
• IP shows overseas
• DNS shows domestic
• Fingerprint uniqueness close to 100%
This combination is highly risky and easily flagged by risk control systems.
This is now a basic requirement.
Don’t test only once or only check IP—multiple tests are essential.
Also check: browser fingerprint, WebRTC leaks, and Canvas fingerprint control.
A single tool can check DNS, IP consistency, and fingerprint anomalies efficiently and clearly.
Many proxy tools’ “DNS leak protection” claims are more marketing than actual security guarantees.
A more reliable approach is to regularly test for DNS leaks and verify whether your configurations are truly effective.
Using comprehensive tools like ToDetect to check DNS, IP, and fingerprints together provides far more reliable insights than single-point testing.
AD