User-Agent (UA for short) may look like a messy string, but it actually serves as an important “browser ID card.”
More importantly, the UA of iOS and Android differs greatly. If you don’t understand it well, it’s easy to run into issues when debugging WebView, detecting device models, or performing browser fingerprinting.
Next, let’s take a closer look at the differences between iOS/Android browser User-Agents, common UA parsing methods, and how to check mobile browser User-Agent.

Simply put, a User-Agent is a string sent by the browser each time it requests a webpage—basically reporting its “identity.”
Developers often use it to determine device type, screen size, and browser capabilities, which helps decide whether to return a mobile page or enable certain features.
Example:
Android:
iOS (whether in WeChat or Chrome):
As you can see: iOS UAs almost always end with the Safari identifier, which is why different iOS browsers are hard to distinguish via UA alone.
① Android UA displays the specific device model (Pixel, Xiaomi, Samsung, etc.)
② iPhone never displays its actual model in UA
③ iOS UA only shows “iPhone” or “iPad,” never revealing whether it’s an iPhone 13 or iPhone 15
This means:
Many in-app browsers are actually WebViews.
① ToDetect browser fingerprint check (supports UA + more fingerprint data)
② Various online UA checker pages
③ Browser debugging tools (Safari on iOS requires a Mac connection)
Among them, ToDetect browser fingerprint checking can view UA plus canvas, WebGL, fonts, and more—very useful for debugging or risk control research.
Check for strings like: Android, iPhone, iPad, Windows, Mac.
Chrome / Safari / Firefox / Edge.
In-app browsers (like Alipay, WeChat) can be detected via identifiers such as MicroMessenger.
You can use regex, UA-parser libraries, or custom rules to extract these fields.
① Do not rely solely on UA when doing mobile adaptation
② iOS Chrome and Safari UAs are nearly identical—use feature detection instead
③ Use Android model fields when handling Android compatibility
④ For anti-scraping and risk control, UA alone is insufficient—combine it with fingerprinting and behavioral data
⑤ If you need to distinguish in-app WebViews, collect lots of UA samples to refine rules
The biggest difference between iOS and Android User-Agent is: Android is more transparent, while iOS is more conservative.
In real development, UA alone is far from enough; combining it with browser fingerprinting leads to much more stable identification.
Whether you're doing frontend adaptation, crawler identification, data analysis, or debugging in-app WebViews, understanding UA structure and limitations—and using tools like ToDetect—will make your work much smoother.
AD